Mmcp.market

Head to head

code-index vs Cords to cubic meters, number discarded

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

code-indexio.github.Regsorm/code-index
B
No reviews yet

Rust code index MCP server, native 1C:Enterprise (BSL) support. 32 tools, AST for 14 languages.

Full listing
Cords to cubic meters, number discardedio.github.sadri-dridi/cord-m3
A
No reviews yet

Cords to cubic meters, number discarded

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Cords to cubic meters, number discarded (91/100 against 77). Cords to cubic meters, number discarded is hosted and callable through the gateway; code-index runs on your own machine. code-index has noticeably more public adoption.

 code-indexCords to cubic meters, number discarded
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A91/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars1170
Downloads / week649–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—30
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryEverything elseEverything else