Head to head
Raven vs melta UI
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Design intelligence for coding agents: audits, design systems, and a taste profile agents consult.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AI-Ready design system MCP: melta UI tokens, component contracts, 99 rules, check_html self-verify
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours melta UI (92/100 against 82). Raven is hosted and callable through the gateway; melta UI runs on your own machine.
| Raven | melta UI | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 201 |
| Downloads / week | 129 | 131 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-24 | 2026-09-27 |
| Category | Media | Media |