Head to head
Tripgain vs Hotelbooking
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Tripgain
Cio.github.RAHULTRIPGAIN/tripgain-mcp-serverNo reviews yet
Corporate travel booking and expense management for TripGain, exposed as an MCP server.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Hotelbooking (80/100 against 67). Tripgain is hosted and callable through the gateway; Hotelbooking runs on your own machine. Hotelbooking has noticeably more public adoption.
| Tripgain | Hotelbooking | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 28 |
| Downloads / week | – | 159 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 3 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-08 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |