Head to head
Battery Proposal Agent vs Protect
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Battery Proposal Agent
Cio.github.QuLi-ops/battery-proposal-agentNo reviews yet
Validate US battery proposals and purchase policy-aware quote and payback results through x402.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (67 and 65 out of 100). Battery Proposal Agent is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine. Protect has noticeably more public adoption.
| Battery Proposal Agent | Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.6k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | 12 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |