Mmcp.market

Head to head

Quibbly LinkedIn Inbox vs Linkedin Data

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Quibbly LinkedIn Inboxco.quibbly/linkedin-inbox
C
No reviews yet

Connect Claude or ChatGPT to your LinkedIn inbox. Research contacts and draft replies for review.

Full listing
Linkedin Datacom.superagnt/linkedin-data
A
No reviews yet

LinkedIn data for AI agents: profiles, companies, jobs, posts, search. Sales research, recruiting.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Linkedin Data (98/100 against 67). Linkedin Data has noticeably more public adoption.

 Quibbly LinkedIn InboxLinkedin Data
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC67/100A98/100
AdoptionNewGrowing
GitHub stars–1
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyYesYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-18
CategorySales and outboundSales and outbound

Other comparisons