Head to head
QRFLOW.codes vs Research Scan
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Create QR codes, re-point printed dynamic codes, name links on your domain, read scan analytics.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Research Scan finds and verifies the 5–10 recent papers that matter most for a research question.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Research Scan (89/100 against 70). QRFLOW.codes is hosted and callable through the gateway; Research Scan runs on your own machine. Research Scan has noticeably more public adoption.
| QRFLOW.codes | Research Scan | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 57 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | Security | Security |