Head to head
World Model MCP vs Rooster Agent Gateway
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Persistent 3D/2D spatial world model for AI agents with entity tracking and simulation.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Discover, read and book verified real-world businesses through one endpoint.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours World Model MCP (94/100 against 69). Rooster Agent Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; World Model MCP runs on your own machine. World Model MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| World Model MCP | Rooster Agent Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 20 | – |
| Downloads / week | 4.2k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 15 | 3 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |