Head to head
Behavior Runtime MCP vs mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
In-browser ~60Hz behavior tree execution engine with reactive triggers and safety guardrails.
Full listingNo reviews yet
MCP server with WebdriverIO for browser and mobile app automation (iOS/Android via Appium)
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Behavior Runtime MCP (94/100 against 86).
| Behavior Runtime MCP | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 39 |
| Downloads / week | 4.1k | 5.3k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |