Head to head
Presend MCP Server vs Quiet Failures
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Free MCP server: 36 security & dev API tools -- WHOIS, DNS, CVE, IP reputation, Cosmos SDK.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Open weekly security base rates (CC BY 4.0), plus live DMARC, takeover and WHOIS checks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Presend MCP Server (79/100 against 56). Presend MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Presend MCP Server | Quiet Failures | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | C56/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 37 | 6 |
| Write actions | 4 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |