Head to head
LinkedIn MCP Server vs Upload-Post
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Find LinkedIn jobs and people, research companies, manage network, posts, and messages with MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Social media MCP: publish, schedule & analyze posts on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn & X
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Upload-Post (100/100 against 88). Upload-Post is hosted and callable through the gateway; LinkedIn MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| LinkedIn MCP Server | Upload-Post | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A100/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 7 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Sales and outbound | Sales and outbound |