Head to head
Magic Cloud vs DB Access
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for Postgres/MySQL/Redshift/SQL Server over SSH/SSM tunnels with secret providers.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 92 out of 100). Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.
| Magic Cloud | DB Access | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 53 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-07 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |