Mmcp.market

Head to head

Surt de Casa (surtdecasa.cat) vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Surt de Casa (surtdecasa.cat)io.github.pmontp19/surtdecasa-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Servidor MCP per surtdecasa.cat: agenda cultural de Catalunya, cartellera de cinema i poblacions.

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Surt de Casa (surtdecasa.cat) (91/100 against 83). Surt de Casa (surtdecasa.cat) is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Surt de Casa (surtdecasa.cat)SSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA91/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0745
Downloads / week9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools4
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons