Mmcp.market

Head to head

Playrunner vs QualityMax QA MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Playrunnerdev.playrunner/mcp
A
No reviews yet

Discover Playwright workflows, start runs, and inspect results in Playrunner Cloud.

Full listing
QualityMax QA MCPio.github.Quality-Max/qmax-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Local QA MCP: scan URLs, inspect pages, generate Playwright repros, and run tests.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (98 and 94 out of 100). Playrunner is hosted and callable through the gateway; QualityMax QA MCP runs on your own machine.

 PlayrunnerQualityMax QA MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA98/100A94/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars32
Downloads / week––
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools—4
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceNOASSERTIONMIT
Last release2026-09-162026-09-14
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

Playrunner vs PySide6 MCPPlayrunner vs PlaywrightPlayrunner vs CloakBrowser MCPPlayrunner vs Oya BrowserPlayrunner vs SMSAll Scraping and browsing servers