Head to head
Snov vs Email
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Snov.io MCP — B2B email finder + contact enrichment + domain search (snov.io)
Full listing
No reviews yet
Query SES send history, delivery events, domains and suppressions, and send from your AWS account.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Email (89/100 against 77). Snov is hosted and callable through the gateway; Email runs on your own machine.
| Snov | ||
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 264 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 39 | 8 |
| Write actions | 5 | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category |