Head to head
Pubmed vs Filamental
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
PubMed MCP — wraps the NCBI E-utilities API (biomedical literature, free, no auth)
Full listingFilamental
Aio.github.Scottnine/filamentalNo reviews yet
Read/write access to your Filamental knowledge graph vault. 17 tools. Local-first, no auth.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (87 and 85 out of 100). Pubmed is hosted and callable through the gateway; Filamental runs on your own machine.
| Pubmed | Filamental | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A87/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 53 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 17 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Security | Security |