Mmcp.market

Head to head

Mhra Alerts vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Mhra Alertsio.github.pipeworx-io/mhra-alerts
B
No reviews yet

MHRA drug and device safety alerts, recalls and Drug Safety Update bulletins,

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (77 and 83 out of 100). Mhra Alerts is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 Mhra AlertsSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0745
Downloads / week9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools39
Write actions5
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else

Other comparisons

Mhra Alerts vs SSH — policy-gated remote access: which MCP server should you use? · mcp.market