Mmcp.market

Head to head

China Disclosures vs SSH — policy-gated remote access

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

China Disclosuresio.github.pipeworx-io/china-disclosures
B
No reviews yet

China Disclosures MCP — non-SEC Chinese biotech deals and HK/STAR IPO

Full listing
SSH — policy-gated remote accessio.github.tufantunc/ssh-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Policy-gated, audited SSH for Linux and Windows hosts: roles, approvals, and an audit log.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (77 and 83 out of 100). China Disclosures is hosted and callable through the gateway; SSH — policy-gated remote access runs on your own machine. SSH — policy-gated remote access has noticeably more public adoption.

 China DisclosuresSSH — policy-gated remote access
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100B83/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0745
Downloads / week–9.3k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools39—
Write actions4—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-17
CategoryEverything elseEverything else