Head to head
PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs World Monitor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP
?io.github.pineforge-4pass/pineforge-codegen-mcpNo reviews yet
Offline PineScript v6 → C++ backtests at deterministic TradingView parity, run locally via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 75 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. World Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP runs on your own machine. World Monitor has noticeably more public adoption.
| PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A95/100 |
| Adoption | — | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 87k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |
Other comparisons
PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs Azure MCP ServerPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs SemioticPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs NetdataPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs Microsoft 365 MCP ServerPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP vs jCodemunch MCPAll Everything else servers