Head to head
PHION Agent Trust Infrastructure vs Local Rag
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
PHION Agent Trust Infrastructure
Csystems.phion/evidence-engineNo reviews yet
69 agent services: verified data, enrichment, Index Feed and PHION Execute via x402.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Local Rag (92/100 against 60). PHION Agent Trust Infrastructure is hosted and callable through the gateway; Local Rag runs on your own machine. Local Rag has noticeably more public adoption.
| PHION Agent Trust Infrastructure | Local Rag | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 399 |
| Downloads / week | – | 4.7k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 75 | — |
| Write actions | 8 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |