Head to head
pgtriage vs Magic Cloud
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
pgtriage
Cio.github.pgtriage/pgtriageNo reviews yet
MCP server for PostgreSQL performance auditing with actionable SQL fixes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Magic Cloud (88/100 against 65). Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.
| pgtriage | Magic Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |