Head to head
Broken Link Checker vs ReplyNodes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crawl a site for broken links, 404s, dead images and redirect chains, with the page each is on
Full listing
No reviews yet
Web MCP: scrape/crawl sites, web search, brand assets, app stores, YouTube, Reddit, Hacker News.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ReplyNodes (89/100 against 67). ReplyNodes has noticeably more public adoption.
| Broken Link Checker | ReplyNodes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 4 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 51 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |