Head to head
Pathguard vs traql
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Crypto transaction safety tool — screens addresses and transactions for scam risk.
Full listing
No reviews yet
AML risk scoring for crypto addresses and transactions on Ethereum, BSC, TRON, TON, Bitcoin
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours traql (85/100 against 73). Pathguard is hosted and callable through the gateway; traql runs on your own machine.
| Pathguard | traql | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B73/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 53 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | 2 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-12 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |