Head to head
Patchloom vs Scrapiq
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent-safe structured edits: JSON/YAML/TOML/md/AST, dry-run, batch/tx. Not a filesystem MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Scrapiq (89/100 against 75). Scrapiq is hosted and callable through the gateway; Patchloom runs on your own machine. Patchloom has noticeably more public adoption.
| Patchloom | Scrapiq | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A89/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 17 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 354 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 1 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |