Head to head
Patchloom vs Systemdox Runbooks
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Agent-safe structured edits: JSON/YAML/TOML/md/AST, dry-run, batch/tx. Not a filesystem MCP.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Your runbooks as agent tools: scripts from runbooks.json served as typed, allowlisted MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Patchloom (75/100 against 65). Patchloom has noticeably more public adoption.
| Patchloom | Systemdox Runbooks | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 17 | – |
| Downloads / week | 470 | 56 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | ISC |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |