Head to head
PasteApply vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Honest resume/cover tailor for agents. Free generate; Stripe unlock for downloads. Streamable HTTP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Product mockup API. Render PSD and 2D mockups, generate videos, manage async jobs and webhooks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (80/100 against 60). PasteApply is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP runs on your own machine. MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| PasteApply | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 369 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | 27 |
| Write actions | 1 | 13 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |