Head to head
Google Health vs Atera MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for the Google Health API, with a local SQLite cache and trend analysis.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Every Atera RMM + PSA endpoint, plus a local SQLite mirror that answers fleet-health, SLA, and
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Google Health (92/100 against 75).
| Google Health | Atera MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | 61 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 19 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |