Head to head
mcp-toolbelt vs SyteCheck
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
29 pay-per-call DNS, SEO, SSL, security, and dev tools for AI agents. x402, no API key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Scan a website for SEO, accessibility, performance and security issues, and read the report.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SyteCheck (78/100 against 57). mcp-toolbelt is hosted and callable through the gateway; SyteCheck runs on your own machine. SyteCheck has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-toolbelt | SyteCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B78/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 66 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 29 | 6 |
| Write actions | 4 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-10 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |