Head to head
Notebooklm Secure vs Raziel
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server teaching AI agents to implement TideCloak: auth, E2EE, IGA, security analysis
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Notebooklm Secure (91/100 against 81). Raziel is hosted and callable through the gateway; Notebooklm Secure runs on your own machine. Notebooklm Secure has noticeably more public adoption.
| Notebooklm Secure | Raziel | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 84 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 101 | 60 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 63 | 20 |
| Write actions | 11 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-03 | 2026-08-20 |
| Category | Security | Security |