Head to head
Image Puma vs Transcriptor MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Image Puma
?io.github.panth-net/Image-PumaNo reviews yet
Plan and run local batch image preparation with explicit confirmation before writing files.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Fetch transcripts, subtitles, chapters, metadata and frames from YouTube and 10+ video platforms
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Transcriptor MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Image Puma runs on your own machine. Transcriptor MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Image Puma | Transcriptor MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A97/100 |
| Adoption | — | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 21 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Media | Media |