Head to head
Anamnesis vs Magic Cloud
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Anamnesis
?io.github.oscardvs/anamnesisNo reviews yet
Cross-machine, file-first memory for Claude Code: markdown + SQLite FTS5, synced with git
Full listing
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.
| Anamnesis | Magic Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A88/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |