Head to head
OpenQR vs Accessproof
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate, edit and track dynamic (editable) QR codes with scan analytics. Hosted MCP and REST API.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Scan a web page's markup for the WCAG failures ADA demand letters cite most often.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenQR (86/100 against 69). OpenQR has noticeably more public adoption.
| OpenQR | Accessproof | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C69/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 7 | – |
| Downloads / week | 45 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 20 | 1 |
| Write actions | 10 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | Security | Security |