Head to head
OpenAgenda vs Scrivener
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Scrivener
Bio.github.writerslogic/scrivener-mcpNo reviews yet
MCP server for Scrivener: read, write, analyze, and search your manuscripts with AI assistants.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours OpenAgenda (100/100 against 75). OpenAgenda is hosted and callable through the gateway; Scrivener runs on your own machine.
| OpenAgenda | Scrivener | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 61 |
| Downloads / week | 117 | 104 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 71 |
| Write actions | — | 8 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-21 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |