Head to head
sqz vs Security Scanner
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pre-injection context compression for coding agents. Zero LLM calls, zero telemetry, offline-safe.
Full listingSecurity Scanner
Cio.github.vpatser1/mcp-server-security-scannerNo reviews yet
Scan MCP configs for 30+ CVEs, prompt injection, tool poisoning; validate OAuth configs
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours sqz (88/100 against 55). sqz has noticeably more public adoption.
| sqz | Security Scanner | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 627 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | 23 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |