Head to head
sqz vs Holon
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pre-injection context compression for coding agents. Zero LLM calls, zero telemetry, offline-safe.
Full listing
No reviews yet
One MCP server for every measured agent: search, compare, call agents paid per success, on a budget
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours sqz (88/100 against 60). Holon is hosted and callable through the gateway; sqz runs on your own machine. sqz has noticeably more public adoption.
| sqz | Holon | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 627 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |