Head to head
MCP Server vs NinjaOne MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Source-timestamped energy data and reviewed OilPriceAPI product facts for MCP clients.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Every NinjaOne report, plus a local store that answers fleet-wide questions no single API call can
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (85/100 against 75).
| MCP Server | NinjaOne MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | 1.5k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 36 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |