Mmcp.market

Head to head

HORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA) vs Protect

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA)io.github.ogasurfproject-jpg/horizon-shield-webmcp
B
No reviews yet

Agent intake desk for property renovation. Read only, CORS open, fail closed, receipts recompute.

Full listing
Protectcom.scopeblind/protect-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA) (79/100 against 65). HORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA) is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine. Protect has noticeably more public adoption.

 HORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA)Protect
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB79/100C65/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars19
Downloads / week–1.6k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools512
Write actions15
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-202026-09-17
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

HORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA) vs AuscaHORIZON SHIELD: Construction Estimate Auditor for Japan (KIRA) vs DataSinkingAll AI and agents servers