Head to head
Offendersearch vs Minutes
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search US sex-offender registries and criminal records, with per-source citations.
Full listing
No reviews yet
The private, owned conversation-memory layer for AI. Record, transcribe, and search every meeting.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Minutes (92/100 against 80). Offendersearch is hosted and callable through the gateway; Minutes runs on your own machine. Minutes has noticeably more public adoption.
| Offendersearch | Minutes | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 1.5k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 5 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-23 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |