Head to head
Aml vs Projectmem
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Screen a payee address before an AI agent pays: sanctions, mixers, scam lists, on-chain risk.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Coding agent memory — one local MCP server for every project. Warns before repeating failed fixes.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (89 and 92 out of 100). Aml is hosted and callable through the gateway; Projectmem runs on your own machine.
| Aml | Projectmem | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 827 |
| Downloads / week | 134 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-20 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |