Head to head
Snowflake MCP Server vs Snowflake id shape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
A Snowflake MCP server — SQL queries, schema exploration, and data insights for AI assistants
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Snowflake id shape (91/100 against 83). Snowflake id shape is hosted and callable through the gateway; Snowflake MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| Snowflake MCP Server | Snowflake id shape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 55 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | 30 |
| Write actions | 3 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |