Head to head
BankMCP™ vs Token Risk
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only MCP server for your own bank accounts via Enable Banking. Self-hosted, one user.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours BankMCP™ (89/100 against 77). Token Risk is hosted and callable through the gateway; BankMCP™ runs on your own machine. BankMCP™ has noticeably more public adoption.
| BankMCP™ | Token Risk | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 240 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 735 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 38 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |