Head to head
BankMCP™ vs Analyst Ratings
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read-only MCP server for your own bank accounts via Enable Banking. Self-hosted, one user.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Analyst Ratings — today's US stock analyst upgrades, downgrades, coverage initiations and…
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours BankMCP™ (89/100 against 77). Analyst Ratings is hosted and callable through the gateway; BankMCP™ runs on your own machine. BankMCP™ has noticeably more public adoption.
| BankMCP™ | Analyst Ratings | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A89/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 240 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 735 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 38 |
| Write actions | — | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |