Head to head
three.ws Portfolio vs uplika
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
An agent's trading state — portfolio value, PnL, live balances, trade feed, and signed transfers.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Publish to social channels from your AI agent. Threads is live; nine more await review.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Portfolio (83/100 against 57). uplika is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Portfolio runs on your own machine. three.ws Portfolio has noticeably more public adoption.
| three.ws Portfolio | uplika | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 206 | – |
| Downloads / week | 34 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 54 |
| Write actions | — | 18 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |