Head to head
nintact vs Domain Security
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Contact forms that actually arrive. No SPF/DKIM, no SMTP. AI sorts them and drafts the reply.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Audit a domain's email and web security: SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, DNSSEC, TLS, WHOIS. No API keys.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Domain Security (92/100 against 82). nintact has noticeably more public adoption.
| nintact | Domain Security | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 255 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category |