Head to head
Pulsefeed X402 vs Treat Rocks
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Pulsefeed X402
Aio.github.Nikolife2016/pulsefeed-x402No reviews yet
Verify x402 payment endpoints before an AI agent pays: scam scan, on-chain checks, trust scores.
Full listingTreat Rocks
Crocks.treat/treat-rocksNo reviews yet
Buy a $2 novelty digital rock over x402 (USDC on Base). Serves payment instructions only.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Pulsefeed X402 (93/100 against 57). Pulsefeed X402 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pulsefeed X402 | Treat Rocks | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 48 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 11 | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |