Head to head
diffctx vs Repowise
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
diffctx
Aio.github.nikolay-e/diffctxNo reviews yet
Selects the minimum code an LLM needs to review a git diff
Full listing
No reviews yet
Codebase intelligence for AI coding agents — graph, git history, docs, decisions, code health.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours diffctx (92/100 against 82). Repowise has noticeably more public adoption.
| diffctx | Repowise | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 4 | 7.1k |
| Downloads / week | 698 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 19 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-27 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |