Head to head
NicheDB vs iNutriPlan Supplement Database MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Sources in, feeds out: an open, ever-growing database of real-time public data, enriched.
Full listingiNutriPlan Supplement Database MCP Server
Cio.github.okyalos76/inutriplan-mcpNo reviews yet
MCP server exposing supplements database used by iNutriPlan.com
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours NicheDB (86/100 against 67). NicheDB has noticeably more public adoption.
| NicheDB | iNutriPlan Supplement Database MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | C67/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 1 | – |
| Downloads / week | 3.4k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 21 | 6 |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |