Head to head
Woodpecker CI vs Sentry DSN Shape
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Read Woodpecker CI repositories, pipelines and logs, and drive builds, secrets and crons
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Sentry DSN Shape (91/100 against 83). Sentry DSN Shape is hosted and callable through the gateway; Woodpecker CI runs on your own machine.
| Woodpecker CI | Sentry DSN Shape | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 31 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 71 | 30 |
| Write actions | 27 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |