Head to head
Netdata vs Tern EV-Charging Analytics
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Real-time infrastructure monitoring with metrics, logs, alerts, and ML-based anomaly detection.
Full listing
No reviews yet
EV-charging site analytics: utilization, demand, peak saturation and corridor benchmarks.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Netdata (88/100 against 64). Netdata has noticeably more public adoption.
| Netdata | Tern EV-Charging Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | C64/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | New |
| GitHub stars | 81k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 26 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |