Head to head
Askell vs X402 List
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Find and vet x402 payment APIs before your agent pays one: uptime, price, on-chain volume.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours X402 List (92/100 against 83). X402 List is hosted and callable through the gateway; Askell runs on your own machine. X402 List has noticeably more public adoption.
| Askell | X402 List | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 27 |
| Downloads / week | 355 | 75 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 9 | 7 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-09-01 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |