Head to head
Neon vs Run402
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listing
No reviews yet
x402 pay-per-call infra for agents: $0.03 image generation, Postgres, auth, storage, functions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 84).
| Neon | Run402 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 648 | 24 |
| Downloads / week | – | 3.5k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 4 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-23 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |